AI : product information sheets

Re : https://www.linkedin.com/posts/chrisfongkh_aigovernance-responsibleai-airiskmanagement-ugcPost-7474641719481749505-zyW5/

Thin slicing, I believe the problem is somewhat deeper.

You seem to point out that there's a plethora of "formats" attempting to "summarise key biases, structural components, etc." ... which has thrashed around recently as much as the trendsalad of words used to describe the model architectures, which are bring brought to market in "innovative" rushiness.

I would simply posit that fundamentally the industry has not consolidated around a standards body, that issues governance language, gounded in standardised terminology.

Example 1 : business language is a mess, but folks like Gaartner provide a "point of view" 

Example 2 : Internet technologies are a mess, but IETF W3C provides a "point of view". 

There is no analogue for AI.

Maybe someday, they will end up with a Artificial Intelligence Engineer Task Force and Agentic Software Consortium.

( I have an embarassingly old interest in complaining about such messes. This is the exact problem I whinged on, about the liberal arts & sciences curriculum's lack of standardised meta-language, traversal graphs, and architecture ... as an undergrad. )

10:14 sleep:cowwork

Model A :

- 2.5 hours / 150 minutes for cowwork, twice a day

- 9 hours for desking and miscellany

Model B :

- 2.5 hours / 150 minutes for cowwork

- 4.5 hours for desking and miscellany

- twice a day

Cowwork : feeding, motor loading, grooming, medication

end of Malaysia?

( response to Nehru : https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1E3srs8ecM )

Now that Malays have climbed the ladder of Malaysia, they are free to throw the ladder away. 😀

Sh+Sk secession is reasonable. It would increase political stability, at the expense of economic development/capital.

But as the historical reasons for including Sh and Sk are DUE to the original plan for the inclusion of Sg ... that is, to maintain a bumi-non-bumi ratio ... the exit of Sg was the same sort of secession as the proposed one above, separating two poles to respectively consolidate federal power in each one.

From a Malay nationalist perspective, 

1. the combined manoeuvre of maintaining the bumi count while retaining the ratio in 1963, followed by lowering the non-bumi count in 1965, is naturally to be followed by 

2. the decades then afforded for the Peninsula bumi count to increase relative to the Peninsula non-bumi count, which as of now allows consolidated bumi dominance on the Peninsula, even if 1963 is completely undone. 

A response to Nehru : https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1E3srs8ecM

Now that Malays have climbed the ladder of Malaysia, they are free to throw the ladder away. 😀

Sh+Sk secession is reasonable. It would increase political stability, at the expense of economic development/capital.

But as the historical reasons for including Sh and Sk are DUE to the original plan for the inclusion of Sg ... that is, to maintain a bumi-non-bumi ratio ... the exit of Sg was the same sort of secession as the proposed one above, separating two poles to respectively consolidate federal power in each one.

From a Malay nationalist perspective, 

1. the combined manoeuvre of maintaining the bumi count while retaining the eatio in 1963, followed by lowering the non-bumi count in 1965, is naturally to be followed by 

2. the decades then afforded for the Peninsula bumi count to increase relative to the Peninsula non-bumi count, which as of now allows consolidated bumi dominance on the Peninsula, even if 1963 is completely undone.