sex bots in Malaysia

conjecture : sex bots will be declared haram

more stuff for Malaysians to get political about in the future

tatacara kenegaraan : BM tidak cukup

Sebagai seorang yang ber PMR, SPM, saya rasa perlaksanaan ini tidak mencukupi. Tak boleh terus kata salah lah, nanti korang tak akan baca perkara seterusnya ... 

Dalam logik modal, adanya kerangka istilah, "perlu", "cukup", dan "mungkin". 

1. Adakah BM perlu, bagi perpaduan? Pendek kata, ya boleh diterima. 

2. Adakah BM cukup, bagi perpaduan? Semestinya tidak ... Jadi apakah unsur-unsur yang melengkapi penggunaan BM, supaya gabungan itu adalah cukup, bagi perpaduan? 

2.1. Pendek kata, latihan amali tatacara kenegaraan mesti lah ditambah kepada penggunaan BM.

Murid antara umur 10 dan 18 mesti menjadi fasih dengan tatacara :

- pembentukan dan pengubahan perlembagaan serta tiap undang di bawahnya

- pengelolaan jentera dewan undangan, kitar hidup wakil rakyat, dan hubungan seharian mereka dengan cabangan eksekutif, secara main-main dengan olok-olok kerajaan

- pengelolaan jentera perhakiman, dan hubungannya dengan cabangan kerajaan selainnya

- pengelolaan cabangan eksekutif dari PM, jemaah, dan badan-badan penguagkuasaan di bawahnya

- dengan peranan MRR sebagai cabangan keempat di Malaysia

3. Mungkin lah, matapelajaran yang tiada ini, LEBIH PENTING DARIPADA BAHASA MELAYU. Tapi perkara ini tidak penting. Yang penting ada lah, nak bagi tahu je ... BM ok, tapi tak cukup. Dan kita kehilangan satu kemahiran dalam HAMPIR SETIAP murid kita yang menjelang kedewasaan sebagai rakyat.

Negara itu lah jentera. Tak baik kalau bahagiannya tak fasih dengan fungsi jentera itu. Lari lah, peranan dan kendalian dirinya ...

reflection on a journey with poors

In the dreamy space before getting up today, I thought about my decisions to intentionally spend MORE time with people who were less economically privileged, from 2001 to 2023 ( ages 18 to 40 ).

I generally held the view that I did not understand them, and that it would be beneficial to live as poorly as possible ( intellectually, materially, emotionally, geopolitically, whatnot ), in order to learn about them, or at the very least to be able to say later that I had put significant time into making sure that I had tried to do so. 

Review questions :

1. Were my presumptions incorrect? What evidence is there?

2. Assuming correct presumptions, did I fail to achieve what I set out to do? What evidence is there?

3. Assuming correct presumptions, and success at what was attempted, was the project worthwhile? What evidence is there?

Discussion ( inconclusive ) :

- My presumption that I did not understand them was too risk averse - I already understood them quite well at 18. Nevertheless, it was worthwhile to check and make sure.

- Operationally, I made some costly mistakes. I would often write-off huge chunks of time, to assist specific individuals, on their whimsical directions. This would have been more valuable if I had apportioned smaller chunks of time to individuals, or the larger chunks to a larger body of stakeholders. In summary, I underdiverisified. 

- Was this chunk of two major phases, four years in academia, and 18 years in commerce, ultimately the best use of time? I really don't know. I don't ask much of life, so almost any results are welcome. 

I proceed with these thoughts in mind.