I was going to ask (a partner) in a long-winded way "why do you like me?" and came up with a description of how I model the valuation of relationships inside my head.
Here's an approach to the analysis of relationship utility, relative to the the universe of options available to the valuer:
Axis 1 : interactions
- (partner) is a good for conversations (sub-categories: types of verbal interactions)
- (partner) is good for cuddles (sub-categories: types of touchy interactions)
Axis 2 : emotional effect
Where "good / bad" could be analysed into effects on the nervous system, any / more than one of : calming / stimulating / motivating / exciting / boring / painful / dreary / depressing
Axis 3 : stack ranking
... and for each tuple of [1,2], a more detailed expansion could include benchmarking against a sample, so that you could reason about the traits of a partner as [1, 2, 3] tuples
4.
- jerng is (probably not :P) a font of commercial, political, monetary opportunity ...
Being able to turn on/off emo stuff means ... I guess, I speak on a rather broad spectrum of irony. Being campy is as fun as being direct?
No comments :
Post a Comment