2026-01-16 at

securing Malay heritage

This is typically the sort of thing that gets you locked up for being "too communist, and not Malay enough", but it would seem to be a useful position for discussion's sake. 

What sort of end-game makes Malaysia both socially vibrant and economically dominant, on Earth?

If not this end-game, what is your preferred end-game? Leaders must be articulate, in order to move from values, to goals, to strategy, to tactics. 

It's just operations efficiency! 😎

---

Academically, "what would Malaysia look like, to make a removal of quotas/a153 and reserves/a89, a reasonable move?"

The shortest answer is "achieve a higher common standard of living/wealth" a.k.a. improve MY's socialist-oriented infrastructure, increasing taxes on warlords, cartels, and majority shareholders, and redistributing goods and services to the B60.

You want 
the T20 to become a T1, ( leaders ) 
the M30 to become a M97, ( political mass : reset button)
the B60 to become a B2 ( WIP )

Back to the foundation in 1957?

- mengapa adanya kami-vs-dia?

- fear of infiltration by communist militants ( obsolete )

- concerns that racial discrimination will perpetuate economic disparity between races ( the ongoing T/M/B debate about whether consitutional and subsidiary legislation has made it better or worse : short answer is probably, better, but messier )

- fear of loss of culture ( European countries have many small detailed laws about standards; we should emulate that; currently Malaysia has big vague laws that everyone fights about every two months )

- fear of loss of raja2 institutions ( this probably doesn't need to change, ever, like in the UK )


No comments :

Post a Comment